AOL bashing - A Great Flame

Attendees
meter@bmerhbfc
Colin Kemp 7K76 BNR
Author
Colin Kemp 7K76 BNR
Summary
For your information:


---forwarded-message---->


 Aug 02 12:57:00 1995

 To:          Todd (T.A.)  Horsman               (BNR)      Dept 7X14   SKY

 From:        Colin (C.W.)  Kemp                 (BNR)      Dept 7X85   SKY

 Subject:     fw:AOL bashing

For your information:


---forwarded-message---->


 Aug 02 10:54:00 1995

 To:          Colin (C.W.)  Kemp                 (BNR)      Dept 7X85   SKY

 From:        Patricia (P.A.)  Dy                (BNR)      Dept 7I61   SKY

 Subject:     AOL bashing

Ha!  I know that you'll appreciate this one...

Trish Dy
x54558

--- Start included post ---

Article: 1980 of alt.humor.best-of-usenet
Path: bmerhc5e.bnr.ca!bcarh8ac.bnr.ca!corpgate!news.utdallas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!qns3.qns.com!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.ysu.edu!not-for-mail
From: Ade Rixon 
Newsgroups: alt.humor.best-of-usenet
Subject: [soc.singles] Re: AOL Stupidity and the clueless fuckers like Seagull
Followup-To: alt.humor.best-of-usenet.d
Date: 25 Jul 1995 15:28:05 -0400
Organization: best of usenet humor
Lines: 27
Sender: [email protected]
Approved: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: unix1.cc.ysu.edu
X-Disclaimer: the "Approved" header verifies header information for article transmission and does not imply approval of content.  See .sig below.
X-Submissions-To: [email protected]

From: Paul Clarke 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: AOL Stupidity and the clueless fuckers like Seagull

In article: <[email protected]>  [email protected] 
(Perestorik) overpowered his psychiatric nurse for long enough to write:

> Why dont you go Jerk off yourself mother fucker???  I've seen many AOlers
> who are intelligent and sensible than your fucking posting.



As an experiment, I blindfolded one of my cats and let it walk around my 
keyboard for a while.  In so doing, it produced a post with greater coherence 
and better grammar than the one above, although it was mostly about fish.

Then I repeated the experiment with a dead lobotomised sheep in a 
straitjacket and got something almost identical to the original post.

Hope this helps.

--
Moderators accept or reject articles based solely on the criteria posted
in the Frequently Asked Questions. Article content is the responsibility
of the submittor.  Submit articles to [email protected]. To write 
to the moderators, send mail to [email protected]. 

--- End   included post ---